Web Application Penetration Testing Methodology

Review Cobalt pentest methodologies for web applications, including microservices.

Web application pentesting is a structured process in which pentesters simulate real-world attacks to identify security vulnerabilities in web applications. This ensures robust security controls, protects sensitive data, and strengthens overall application security.

Cobalt follows an industry-standard methodology based primarily on the OWASP Application Security Verification Standard (ASVS), the OWASP Testing Guide, and the OWASP Top 10 risks. Cobalt’s approach combines manual and automated testing techniques, using best-in-class security tools to ensure comprehensive coverage.

Penetration testing of a web application includes the following stages:

During the assessment, Cobalt evaluates application security through black-box or grey-box testing methodologies, identifying security flaws in business logic, authentication, authorization, and input handling.

Standard web application pentests include testing of APIs that serve application content. For more in-depth API testing, you can:

  • create a dedicated API pentest or
  • create a combined Web + API pentest

To learn which methodology aligns with your use case, refer to Selecting Your Test Type: Web or API.

Target Scope Reconnaissance

During this phase, Cobalt’s pentesters gather and analyze publicly available information about the target application, including:

  • Application URLs and subdomains
  • Business logic overview and key functionalities
  • Identification of critical assets and high-value targets

Cobalt’s pentesters confirm the following before proceeding:

  • The ability to reach and scan the target(s)
  • Testing permissions and authentication mechanisms
  • Application functionality

Business and Application Logic Mapping

Cobalt manually reviews the application’s business logic, workflows, and access controls. We analyze the following security aspects:

  • User Roles & Access Control Mapping: Reviewing Role-Based Access Control (RBAC) and Attribute-Based Access Control (ABAC) models
  • Business Logic Abuse Scenarios: Identifying vulnerabilities that could bypass intended workflows
  • Session & Authentication Mechanisms: Evaluating session management and Multi-Factor Authentication (MFA) protections
  • Client-Side vs. Server-Side Controls: Ensuring proper enforcement on the server-side

Automated Web Crawling and Web Scanner Configuration

Automated scans are fine-tuned to maximize detection accuracy while minimizing noise. This phase includes:

  • Identifying unauthenticated and authenticated endpoints
  • Enumerating input fields, hidden parameters, and dynamic pages
  • Ensuring all sections of the application are included in security scans

Vulnerability Scanning

Unauthenticated Scanning

Cobalt’s pentesters assess the application from the perspective of an external, unauthenticated attacker. This phase helps identify vulnerabilities that are exposed to the public or prior to login. In this part of the pentest process, our pentesters:

  • Perform automated scanning of publicly accessible endpoints and services
  • Enumerate available routes, APIs, and metadata (e.g., error messages, headers)
  • Test for improper access controls on restricted resources
  • Identify information disclosure through verbose errors, misconfigured headers, or open directories.
  • Assess login functionality for brute-force resilience, enumeration vectors, and insecure implementations
  • Check for exposed administrative panels, forgotten endpoints, or outdated components

Authenticated Scanning

Cobalt’s pentesters leverage authenticated sessions to identify security risks that require privileged access. This phase includes:

  • Automated scanning using authenticated user sessions
  • Verification of session management flaws (e.g., session fixation, JWT misconfigurations)
  • Manual business logic validation and anti-automation testing
  • Identification of weak authentication mechanisms

Manual Web Vulnerability Tests and Exploit Reviews

This phase focuses on manual security testing to uncover vulnerabilities that automated scanners miss. It includes:

  • Injection Attacks (SQL, XSS, Command Injection, SSRF, etc.)
  • Broken Access Controls & IDOR Testing (OWASP Top 10 2021: #1 Risk)
  • Session Management Attacks (Session Hijacking, Token Replay, Cookie Tampering)
  • Weak Cryptographic Implementations (Improper storage of credentials, weak encryption)
  • Modern Web App Attacks (DOM-based XSS, CSP Bypasses, Prototype Pollution)
  • Microservices Security (CORS misconfigurations, unauthorized API interactions)
  • Business Logic
  • Testing the web server for external network vulnerabilities. Note: This is not a full external network penetration test.

Advanced Security Testing for Modern Web Apps

With the rise of Single Page Applications (SPAs), microservices, and cloud-based applications. Cobalt performs additional security tests, including:

  • Client-Side JavaScript Security Audits (Detection of vulnerable dependencies, inline script injection risks)
  • WebSockets & Real-Time Communication Testing
  • Cross-Origin Resource Sharing (CORS) Exploitability Checks

Ongoing Security Assessments and Continuous Testing

Cobalt provides real-time security feedback throughout the engagement, enabling:

  • Collaboration with developers and security teams
  • Ongoing risk analysis & vulnerability triaging
  • Proactive remediation guidance

Reporting, Triaging, and Retesting

Cobalt pentesters report and triage all vulnerabilities during the assessment. You can review details of all findings, in real time, through the Cobalt platform. In these findings, as well as in any report, Cobalt’s pentesters include detailed information, including:

  • Step-by-step remediation guidance
  • Recommendations on how to improve your overall security posture

You can remediate findings during and after the pentest. Then you can submit findings for retest. Our pentesters test the updated components and retest vulnerabilities to ensure that there are no security-related residual risks.

Last modified April 24, 2025